8 Best AI Voice Agents for Recruitment in 2026

Recruitment teams don’t struggle because they lack applicants. They struggle because every job post brings in hundreds of responses, many of them unqualified, and screening them all takes time recruiters don’t have.

AI voice agents help by handling the repetitive, early-stage conversations - screening candidates over the phone, asking the right questions, and routing qualified applicants forward - so recruiters can focus on real hiring decisions.

In this guide, we’ve curated the top AI voice agents for recruitment, based on what actually matters. Let’s begin.

A Quick Overview of the Top AI Voice Agents for Recruitment

Top 8 AI Voice Agents for Recruitment

Plivo

Best for: Recruitment teams and hiring platforms that want to run real AI voice agents on actual phone calls, not demos or chat-only experiences.

Plivo is a voice-first AI agent and cloud communications platform built to automate real phone conversations at scale. Unlike many AI voice tools that depend on external telephony providers, Plivo owns and operates its telephony, messaging, and AI layers as a single stack. This gives teams more consistent call quality, lower latency, and better reliability as volume increases.

For recruitment use cases, this matters because screening calls, qualification conversations, and candidate follow-ups need to work predictably. Teams can start quickly using Plivo’s no-code AI agent builder, Vibe, and then add deeper programmable control through APIs as workflows grow more complex, without switching platforms.

Plivo is trusted by Fortune 500 companies worldwide, delivers 99.99% uptime, and complies with standards such as HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2, PCI DSS, and STAR, making it suitable for high-volume and regulated hiring environments.

Key features

• Build AI voice agents on real phone calls: Plivo lets teams build AI agents that answer, route, qualify, and complete conversations on inbound and outbound phone calls using its native voice infrastructure.
• No-code AI agent builder (Vibe): Vibe allows teams to create and deploy AI voice agents using plain-English instructions. Recruiters can define goals, workflows, and actions without writing code, then iterate as hiring needs evolve.
• Built-in telephony (not third-party): Phone numbers, global connectivity, call routing, recording, and SIP trunking are native to Plivo. This avoids reliance on external carriers and helps maintain low latency and high uptime.
• Real-time audio streaming: Plivo streams live call audio over WebSockets to AI runtimes, enabling low-latency speech recognition and responses, natural turn-taking, and interruption handling during conversations.
• Programmable voice and messaging APIs: Well-documented APIs and SDKs give teams full control over calls, messages, verification, number masking, and workflows, making it easy to integrate AI agents with ATSs, CRMs, and internal systems.
• Multi-channel AI conversations: The same agent logic can run across voice, SMS, WhatsApp, and chat, with shared context across channels so candidates do not have to repeat themselves.

Pros 

• Reliable performance at scale: Users consistently cite stability and uptime, even with high call volumes.
• Strong telephony control: Teams value having direct ownership of routing, numbers, and call behavior.
• Flexible for both no-code and API users: Works well for recruiters and engineering teams alike.

Cons

• More capability than very simple use cases require: Smaller teams may not use the full platform depth.
• Advanced workflows benefit from upfront planning: Complex agent logic requires thoughtful setup. 

Pricing

Plivo offers pay-as-you-go pricing on the Professional plan with no monthly commitment, while Enterprise plans start at $1,000 per month for teams that need higher scale and dedicated support.

Lindy 

Best for: Recruiting teams that want a flexible, AI voice agent to handle candidate calls, follow-ups, and interview scheduling without heavy engineering work.

Lindy is an AI agent platform that lets recruiters deploy voice-enabled AI assistants to manage candidate communication across phone calls, calendars, and workflows. Rather than being a pure telecom infrastructure provider, Lindy focuses on task-oriented AI agents that can talk to candidates, coordinate schedules, and take action across tools like email and calendars. This makes it especially useful for lean recruiting teams that want automation without building everything from scratch.

Key features

• Place and receive natural-sounding phone calls with candidates for screening, follow-ups, and confirmations

• Coordinates availability and books interviews directly on connected calendars

• AI agents can call candidates, send emails, update records, and trigger next steps automatically
• Connects with calendars, email, and internal tools to keep recruiting workflows in sync
• Escalates conversations to a recruiter when the AI detects uncertainty or complex questions

Pros

• Recruiters can launch AI voice workflows without deep technical setup

• Especially effective for scheduling, rescheduling, and candidate follow-ups

• Can reason across steps instead of just asking static screening questions

Cons

• Lacks deep hiring metrics or ATS-native reporting

• Less granular call routing and voice infrastructure control than CPaaS platforms 

Pricing

Lindy offers a free plan with 400 credits per month. Paid plans start at $49.99 per month.

Twilio 

Best for: Engineering-led recruiting teams that want to build highly customizable AI voice agents on top of enterprise-grade voice and messaging infrastructure.

Twilio is a cloud communications platform that provides programmable APIs for voice calls, SMS, and messaging. In recruitment, it’s often used as the underlying infrastructure for AI voice agents that handle candidate screening calls, interview scheduling, reminders, and follow-ups. Rather than offering ready-made recruiting agents, Twilio gives teams the building blocks to design custom voice workflows tailored to their hiring process.

Key features

• Twilio lets you design exactly how calls are placed, routed, recorded, and escalated, giving full control over the candidate calling experience.
• Built-in support for international phone numbers, SMS, and voice delivery makes it suitable for distributed or global hiring.
• Twilio integrates cleanly with speech-to-text, text-to-speech, and large language models to power conversational AI agents.
• Voice events can trigger downstream actions in ATSs, CRMs, calendars, or internal systems.

Pros

• You’re not constrained by predefined workflows—every part of the voice experience can be tailored to your hiring process.
• Designed to handle high call volumes with strong uptime and telecom stability.
• Suitable for advanced or global recruiting operations where off-the-shelf tools fall short.

Cons

• Building an AI voice recruiter with Twilio requires technical resources and ongoing development.
• As call volume and automation increase, usage-based pricing can become expensive.

Pricing

Usage-based, pay-as-you-go pricing starting at roughly $0.008–$0.014 per minute for voice calls, with additional costs for phone numbers and advanced features.

HeyMilo

Best for: Recruiters and staffing teams that want AI-powered voice interviews and automated candidate screening at scale. 

HeyMilo is a recruitment platform built around conversational AI voice and multimedia interviewing, designed to automate candidate engagement, screening, evaluation, and structured interviews. Instead of just asking preset questions, HeyMilo’s AI adapts dynamically to candidate responses and delivers data-backed insights tailored to each role. 

Key features

• Natural two-way spoken interviews that adapt to candidate responses and assess fit.
• Contacts applicants via phone, web voice/video, SMS, email, and WhatsApp.
• Provides structured interview reports and scoring to inform hiring decisions.
• Works with existing applicant tracking and HR systems to sync data.
• Enables interviews and outreach in multiple languages for global recruiting.

Pros

• Can conduct hundreds of interviews simultaneously, easing burden on recruiters. 
• Automated scoring and structured interviews help reduce manual variation. 

Cons

• AI may struggle with very open-ended or highly contextual responses that a human interviewer would catch. 
• Teams need to configure questions and scoring to fit specific roles and workflows. 

Pricing

HeyMilo does not publish pricing publicly, and you need to contact their sales team for current plans and quotes.

Synthflow

Best for: HR departments at mid-sized companies looking to automate interview scheduling and FAQ handling.

Synthflow is a no-code conversational AI platform that lets users design, launch, and manage AI voice agents to automate phone interactions. Rather than providing a ready-made recruiter bot, Synthflow gives teams a visual builder where they can create custom voice workflows. It emphasizes flexibility and usability, making it suitable for recruiting teams that want to own their own voice agent logic without writing code.

Key features

• You can design modular voice flows with a no-code builder where specialized "subflows" act as independent agents to manage complex logic, such as a "Verification Agent" for candidate ID or an "Appointment Agent" for booking interviews.
• Provides enterprise-grade telephony integrations to ensure reliable inbound and outbound calling.
• A dedicated environment to test recruitment scripts and agent responses before they go live with real candidates.
• Offers live insights into active calls, allowing recruitment managers to track performance and candidate engagement as it happens.
• Allows for the refinement of the AI’s underlying data to ensure the recruiter's brand voice and industry-specific terminology are accurate.

Pros

• Teams can build and iterate voice agents without engineering resources.
• Works for screening, candidate engagement, follow-ups, and scheduling.
• Built to manage higher call volumes as hiring needs grow.

Cons

• Requires manual building of hiring-focused flows and templates.
• Deep conversational logic and integration workflows benefit from thoughtful design and testing.

Pricing

Synthflow's pricing consists of a usage-based "Pay as you go" model that is free to start and a custom "Enterprise" tier for teams handling more than 10,000 minutes per month.

CloudTalk

Best for: Teams that need a cloud-based calling platform with AI voice agents and automation.

CloudTalk is a cloud call center platform that combines VoIP calling with AI-powered automation and voice agents. While it’s not built exclusively for recruitment, its AI voice agents, smart dialers, and call routing features make it well-suited for hiring teams that rely heavily on phone communication. Recruiters can use CloudTalk to automate outbound candidate calls, handle inbound inquiries, and track call performance through built-in analytics and conversation intelligence.

Key features

• Virtual voice agents that can autonomously answer and place calls, handle routine interactions, and support self-serve caller experiences. 
• Dialers, automated routing, IVR menus, and parallel dialing to manage large outbound and inbound call volumes. 
• Local numbers in 160+ countries with VoIP calling, SMS, and messaging options. 
• Connects with CRMs, helpdesks, and workflow systems for synced activity and inbox-to-call continuity.

Pros

• Combines calling, campaign automation, and AI workflows in a single system. 
• Support for international numbers and multi-region operations. 
• Built-in conversation intelligence and analytics help teams understand patterns and coach more effectively. 

Cons

• It’s primarily a call center and sales/support voice platform, so recruiters may need extra configuration for hiring use cases. 
• Broad call center capabilities can overwhelm teams only seeking simple voice agent recruiting tools.

Pricing

CloudTalk offers user-based subscription plans for its core calling platform, starting at $25 per user/month when billed annually, with higher tiers adding advanced features like analytics and automation.

Talvin 

Best for: Hiring teams that want an AI voice recruiter focused on structured screening and automated reference checks, not just interview scheduling or call automation.

Talvin is an AI recruitment platform built around voice-based candidate screening and reference checks. Its AI conducts structured, conversational interviews over voice to assess communication, experience, and role fit, then follows up with automated reference calls to gather standardized feedback. Talvin is positioned less as a general-purpose voice agent and more as a screening and validation layer that helps recruiters qualify candidates before human interviews. 

Key features

• Talvin conducts structured phone interviews to assess candidate fit early, so recruiters aren’t reviewing unqualified applicants.
• Instead of manual follow-ups, Talvin collects reference feedback automatically and delivers it in a standardized format.
• Interview questions and scoring are tailored to each role, keeping evaluations consistent across candidates.
• Recruiters receive clear interview and reference reports rather than raw call recordings.

Pros

• Designed specifically to screen and validate candidates, not just move them through a funnel.
• Eliminates one of the most time-consuming and error-prone steps in hiring.
• Standardized interviews and references make it easier to compare candidates objectively.

Cons

• Not intended for outreach campaigns, scheduling-only workflows, or high-volume dialing.
• Often paired with an ATS or sourcing platform rather than used end-to-end.

Pricing

Talvin’s plans start at $175/month and scale up to $750/month, based on interview volume and hiring needs.

VoiceFlow

Best for: Product-led recruiting teams that want to design and control the logic of AI voice conversations before deploying them on phone calls.

Voiceflow is a collaborative platform where teams design, develop, and launch AI agents using their preferred models and integrations. In practice, you build an agent by first creating a knowledge base, then adding workflows that define what the agent should do, integrating third-party tools through APIs, and finally launching the agent through Voiceflow’s web chat UI or the Dialog API.

For recruitment, this is useful when you want an agent that can answer candidate questions, guide screening conversations, and trigger workflow steps like collecting details, confirming availability, or handing off to a human, all while staying consistent with your hiring process.

Key features

• Import documents and data so the agent answers using curated, controlled information rather than guessing.
• Create multi-step tasks the agent can complete, so conversations can lead to actions, not just responses.
• Connect the agent to third-party services using Voiceflow Functions and API blocks.
• Deploy using Voiceflow’s web chat UI or build your own interface using the Dialog API.
• Designed for teams to build and iterate together, rather than working in isolated scripts.

Pros 

• Strong control over how screening and interview conversations are structured.
• Teams can refine conversations without touching telephony systems.
• Recruiters, designers, and product teams can work together on flows.

Cons 

• Requires a telephony platform to place and receive calls.
• Teams must design screening logic from scratch.

Pricing 

Voiceflow offers a free Starter plan, with paid plans starting at $60/month (Pro) and $150/month (Business), while Enterprise pricing is custom for high-volume teams.

Questions to ask before choosing an AI voice agent for recruitment

1. Who actually owns the calling infrastructure?

When evaluating an AI voice agent, one of the first things to understand is how calls are handled behind the scenes. Some platforms rely heavily on third-party telephony providers, while others manage their own calling infrastructure more directly.

This distinction matters because it affects call quality, routing control, and reliability as usage grows. Tools with tighter control over their telephony stack tend to behave more predictably, especially when call volume increases or issues need to be diagnosed quickly.

2. Does the agent respond quickly enough to feel natural?

Voice conversations depend on timing. Even small delays between a candidate’s response and the agent’s reply can make the interaction feel uncomfortable or disjointed.

A well-designed AI voice agent should respond promptly and consistently throughout the conversation. This usually reflects how well speech recognition, language processing, and voice generation work together in real time. If responses feel slow or uneven during a demo, that friction will likely show up even more in real recruiting scenarios.

3. Is the product actually designed for recruitment conversations?

Recruitment is not a generic use case. Screening candidates requires structured questions, follow-ups based on previous answers, and clear decision points about what happens next.

Some voice agents are flexible but require significant customization to support hiring workflows. Others are built with recruitment logic in mind from the start. The difference shows up in how easily the agent can handle screening, availability checks, and smooth handoffs to human recruiters.

4. How does it handle things going off script?

Real conversations are rarely perfect. Candidates interrupt, misunderstand questions, or give incomplete answers.

An effective AI voice agent should be able to handle these moments without breaking the experience. This includes asking for clarification, continuing the conversation naturally, or exiting gracefully when needed. Systems that cannot manage these situations tend to feel fragile in real-world use.

5. Will it still work when hiring volume increases?

Hiring needs fluctuate. A tool that performs well for a small number of calls may struggle when activity ramps up.

It is important to understand how the platform behaves under higher load, both technically and operationally. This includes call quality, reliability, and whether usage scales in a predictable way. A system that handles growth smoothly allows recruiting teams to expand outreach without introducing new problems.

Try Plivo free

Getting started with AI voice agents for recruitment doesn’t need to be complicated or risky. With Plivo, you can sign up for a free trial account and get free credits to test real AI-powered phone calls, without committing upfront or changing your existing hiring workflows.

You can experiment with live screening calls, candidate follow-ups, and interview coordination using Plivo’s no-code tools or APIs. This lets you simulate real recruiting scenarios with your own data and logic before deciding how deeply you want to scale automation across voice, SMS, and WhatsApp.

Get started with your free trial today and begin building your first AI voice agent for recruitment.

FAQs

What is an AI voice agent in recruitment?

An AI voice agent is a system that conducts phone conversations with candidates to handle tasks like screening, availability checks, and interview scheduling.

Can AI voice agents replace recruiters?

No. They are designed to support recruiters by automating repetitive early-stage tasks, not to replace human decision-making.

Are AI voice agents reliable for candidate screening?

They work well for structured, rule-based screening, but nuanced evaluation and final decisions should still be handled by humans.

What should companies look for when choosing an AI voice agent?

Key factors include call quality, response speed, recruitment-specific workflows, and the ability to scale reliably with hiring volume.

‍